First Draft - June 6
Global News Video - Petition to Halt Expansion
As I understand the challenge with the Salmon Farms, as
defined by the environmental movement, the wild stocks are being impacted by
the Salmon Farms location vis-à-vis the migration route of Salmon Smolt and the
location of the farms, and the resulting transfer of parasites and disease. Additionally,
there have been the inadvertent release of “Atlantic Salmon” into the west coast
fishery, with some concern of implanting an “invasive” species.
There is a paradox at play with fish farming, at once fish
farming offers the solution to the overuse of wild stocks and yet the
operation of fish farms comes with some reported damaging externalities. The curtailment of fish
farms on the coast of British Columbia seems to negate the promise of relief of
harvest of wild stocks, fish consumption is growing and will grow at a greater rate. Perhaps there is a management solution, by way of
example, the facilitation of the relocation or reconfiguration of fish
farming operations.
One realizes there is economics at play, fish farm
operators have found the most “efficient” means to raise fish; open nets, floats
and present feeding modalities generate a circumstance that answers market
realities. The question becomes, to what
extent has their license to function impacted other operations – eg. Wild fish
stocks. Of course, there is a greater question than a mere partial budget on
pounds of fish raised, there is the general stewardship of the ecosystem at
play.
What has emerged out of the debate is polarization and
confrontation, it seems in British
Columbia “polarization” is never far away – as issues like this invariably become
politicized. If only one could look at the issue in a pristine state and let
judgment rule, the challenge of course is that at some point science ends and
then it is the eye of the master that fattens the cattle – in a polarized
circumstance when the science ends – well it never ends – people always find
ways of distorting the numbers.
In responding to the challenge the key is to make policy around an honest assessment of facts and respond in accord with the facts - stating the obvious it seems - it rarely happens quite this way. There is strong data to support the environmentalists in this case - or at least the "non-fish farming" perspective, the challenge I have is, I've heard the environmental movement cry wolf so often - grossly overstating the risk. We need to be prepared to use our natural environment, there is throughout the province example after example of projects being obstructed. There is legitimate environmentalism and there is preservation/obstruction - one worries that valid points get muted by the chronic deployment of heated rhetoric.
More Thoughts on Environmentalism Reconsidered
No comments:
Post a Comment