Monday, April 14, 2025

Mr. Carney - I respectfully disagree - Enough bad carbon policy and more attendance to long standing values please.


 CLICK HERE FOR MY PROFESSIONAL WEBSITE

I started reading Mark Carney’s book. I reviewed the preface and was compelled to respond to that; I’ll give the rest of it my attention later. With the election looming, one feels it's critical to offer comment in the hope that the people who read this will, at a minimum, call Mr. Carney to task.

In paragraph 2 of the preface titled Values into Action, he states I was “humbled by the developments I didn't expect, particularly the sense of division and abandonment felt by many Canadians during the latter stages of the pandemic”. It was clear at the outset of the pandemic that people were feeling alienated and abandoned. There was an authoritarian crackdown that was unnecessary and unkind and contravened or infringed upon many of our charter rights. It seemed that Canadian authorities were more willing to listen to the WHO than to respect the charter of rights and freedoms and 400 years of jurisprudence that gives Canadian citizens the right to domain over mind and body. Further, the federal government resorted to actuating the Emergencies Act and went so far as to freeze the bank accounts of Canadian citizens and Canadian citizens exercising their right to defend their Charter rights - these actions, when reviewed in retrospect by authorities, have been deemed to be heavy-handed and grossly inappropriate. I sincerely hope that this gross example of authoritarianism is exempt from Mr. Carney's view of the New World Order.

I contrast what was clearly a dystopian reality in the management of the pandemic with what I perceive Mr. Carney's life would have been like as a young person in northern Alberta. Mr. Carney then was enjoying the fruits of John Diefenbaker's work. Mr. Carney had the protection of the Canadian Bill of Rights, and he also had the compassion instilled by Lester B Pearson. Neither of these men would ever dream of resorting to the authoritarian tactics that were deployed during the COVID-19 response. He was also living in the midst of people who had sacrificed the best six years of their lives or sacrificed loved ones or had lost several friends in defence of the cause of freedom. He was also living in a community that emerged out of an agrarian-based society, as opposed to a community that some politician decided to design. He would have enjoyed a degree of security in his childhood that would be incomprehensible to someone living in, say, Toronto now. Mr. Carney and I are of a generation that was handed the most promising world in human history. if you look around now with clear eyes, what you're seeing is Western civilization treading water, and that's an optimistic assessment.

Emergencies Measures Act - it all depends on the context in which it is deployed.

Mr. Carney states the “values of the market are usurping those of humanity”. Mr. Carney also states that “market fundamentalism corrodes social values and fosters the crisis of our age”. Markets are not created; they emerge out of the wants, needs and desires of human beings. There is no means by which markets separate us from our values; they are a vivid depiction of our values, and if you don't like it, it's us you're looking at. If markets are left to function absent constraining regulation, they administer the distribution of goods and services without prejudice. When markets begin to hurt people, access to them is constrained by a captured regulatory regime. When markets begin to hurt people is when bad regulation turns incumbent actors' regulatory desires into supply management programs. On October 24, 1978, Jimmy Carter deregulated the United States airline industry, and by doing so, effectively deregulated the world airline industry. Regulations to that point address safety, but foremost, they were a supply management program. When he got rid of the supply management program but left the safety regulations in place, flying became extraordinarily inexpensive relative to before.  

                                             CLICK HERE FOR MY PROFESSIONAL WEBSITE

Mr. Carney suggests we need “radical changes to build a better world for all”. Never in human history has there been a better world for all; we are sitting at the pinnacle of human existence. We are at the pinnacle of human existence due to honest and compassionate men like John Diefenbaker, Lester B Pearson, Tommy Douglas, and Pierre Elliott Trudeau, men who believed in classical liberal values and reasonable support for the unfortunate. We're at the pinnacle of human existence for another good reason, and that is that we let markets work as they should work in most cases for an extensive period of time. It's time to let them work again. I would suggest to anybody that takes the time to read this that the last thing we need are radical changes; what we need to do is ground ourselves in the principles expressed in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and liberate markets by reducing regulatory capture.

Mr. Carney describes the failure of the cod fishery off the grand banks as a tragedy of the commons, as a market failure. My assessment of the cod fishery failure off the grand banks is that the government instituted a program called Fishing for Stamps. This program made it economic the fish long after fishing was viable absent the program and was a major contributing factor in the decimation of the cod fishery. The rationale at the time was that the communities in Newfoundland needed to be supported; it was an example, a less than shining example, of social engineering. In the end, what had to happen happened; New Foundlander's went elsewhere to work. A sad ending to an epic error in Canadian history.

Causes of the Great Recession

Environmentalism Reconsidered - Lessons from the Canadian Cod Fishery

Seeding Prosperity - Why it matters

Mr. Carney suggests we need to spend $2 trillion in response to the “climate crisis”. The liberal government promised $50 billion to companies to manufacture batteries that would have been manufactured anyway and that we have yet the grid capacity to charge. The carbon mania that Mr. Carney communicates in the preface to his book, or perhaps carbon obsession, is damaging our environment. Rather than frittering away money on things that will make no difference at a world scale, rather than advocating a $170 tonne price for carbon and hurting our economy, rather than putting municipalities and governments through climate gymnastics that have no effect on the world situation, perhaps we should give some attention to our environment. Perhaps we should have taken that $50 billion and invested in spawning bed improvements for our salmon; perhaps we should find a way to stop the runoff from the highways getting into our waterways and killing our salmon; perhaps we should invest in habitat enhancement and preservation. 77,000,000 years ago, the earth was so warm that all the polar caps melted. Mother Earth did that all by herself; no industrial revolution was necessary. If Mother Nature did it once, she can do it again; if Mother Nature could put NYC under 10 miles of ice, she can do it again. We should be investing in hardening our environment against impending calamities, and we should be investing in preparedness.

Click Here - For more on Carbon Policy

Carbon Tax Stupid Policy

Mr. Carney indicates that somehow net 0 and sustainability equate to one another. Mr. Carney heralds Canada’s electrical grid, a grid comprised primarily of fossil fuel electricity generation, some nuclear electricity generation and hydroelectric electricity generation. One of the largest environmental disasters in Canadian history is the damming of rivers for hydroelectric power, which has destroyed thousands of acres of prime land, prime forests, First Nations territories, critical wintering habitat, and entire fisheries, and drowned wildlife. Presumably, if you're afraid of carbon, you'll encourage this carnage to continue.  

Mr. Carney states, “when society sets a clear goal, it becomes profitable to be a part of the solution and terminal to remain a part of the problem”. This sounds to me like a call for heavy-handedness and authoritarianism in pursuing the solution to what's perceived to be a climate crisis. We have environmental issues that need attention, and there is merit in the prudent pursuit of carbon reduction. There is no merit in throwing Canada on a sword when nothing we do here, within our borders, will effect any change in world carbon emissions. We are, effectively, at net 0 now - depending on who's calculating, our managed forest in combination with our unmanaged forest leaves us at or near net 0. If you're going to make being a part of a problem terminal, before the genocide begins, we ought to make sure the problem is justifying the means. No honest person can say with certainty that we're in a crisis; we do have a challenge, but there's no crisis. The good thing about creating a crisis and scaring people is that they'll accept just about anything for a solution. So, it looks like Alberta’s energy industry is on the chopping block - it has been obstructed and maligned for 10 years. Then will 10 minutes, cities and a surveillance state follow?


Mr. Carney touts renewable energy as the solution; he believes that somehow how pricing carbon is going to change what many credible actors, including the US Energy Information Administration, indicate is folly. See the thin green line above; renewables are a century away from being serious contenders.  

What seems to go unmentioned are the true values of Canada: self-reliance, civil rights, answering the call, the promise of transcendence with the application of effort, honesty, respect for institutions represented in the pillars of government, and respect for the world left us in the aftermath of WW2. These are replaced by what sounds like the willingness to abandon the cause of freedom in the interest of radical policies that promise to constrain Canadians. When you teach the golden rule, when you teach love and tolerance, when you teach to be nurturing, when you teach the value of truth, integrity, honour, the pursuit of virtue – you negate the need for re-education programs, you negate the need for DEI programs – you develop a loving and harmonious society.

 

No comments: