Inflation-protected Adjunctive Currency Parallel Banknotes - Why is government decreasing it's revenues to help Canadians with inflation. When they can generate revenue and accomplish the a better outcome.

 

CLICK HERE - My Professional Website

Asset-Backed Currency

They say that pointing out problems without offering a solution is just complaining. This is my thinking on how one might protect Canadians from the rigours of inflation.

Proposition

Whereas inflation destroys the wealth of Canadians and the government’s policies have generated inflation, it is incumbent on the government to take measures to protect Canadians from the negative effects of it.

Situation Analysis

Presently, we rely entirely on a fiat currency. Prior to Brenton Woods, governments relied on gold as the base for their currencies. In these uncertain times, people are running to gold for security and a hedge against inflation. Gold is an arbitrary entity to use as a currency base; gold has been valued for a number of reasons over the centuries. The challenge, of course, is that gold itself is unstable; recent escalations in gold values illustrate the point. Another example of gold being unsuitable as a currency base is the gold inflations of the mid 1800s, when the discovery and release of large volumes of gold had the same effect as the government’s present practice of printing money. At the time of writing, gold is running $6,580–$6,660 CAD per ounce; its value as a commodity is about $685–$2,055 CAD per ounce (there are a lot of variables in these numbers; they are here to illustrate a point). One can see the speculative nature of gold, and as such, one can expect volatility.

CLICK HERE: For discourse on currency and economy

Click Below

For Discourse on Specific Causal Elements of the

2008 recession & subject matter related to this topic

Cycles

Real Estate Lending

Trading Systems

Leverage

Oil Price

The Real Economy & The Financial Economy - Harmonics

Framing the solution

Fiat currencies have, in the main, served us well, albeit that governments tend to abuse the medium. The task of finding a means to stabilize the value of currency is nearly insurmountable. This has brought my thinking to an adjunctive currency. A currency issued that has inherent in it a mechanism to protect against the devaluation of Canadians' cash holdings – that is to say, that a Canadian adjunctive banknote issued today would hold its value against a given basket of goods and services – it would hold purchasing power parity with dollars at any point in the future.

Potential Structure

The promise is to only protect against inflation. To do this, one needs to base the adjunctive currency. I would suggest that one would use the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) as the program actuary. The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB), which manages the investable assets of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), has delivered net returns that have consistently exceeded the rate of inflation over long-term periods, based on its reported performance. The real return (nominal return minus inflation) of 5.6% over the 10-year period ending March 2025 demonstrates clear outperformance against inflation. 

Functionality

The central bank would print $100 notes each quarter. Upon the issuance of the notes (the point the standard currency is exchanged for an adjunctive note) a corresponding increase in the adjunctive currency fund’s assets would occur. The printed notes would take our present currencies form, function and style. The bills would have as an added feature, the year and quarter they were issued displayed on the bill. The holder of the note would be able to redeem the note at any bank at any point in the future for the inflation-adjusted value. The banks would be in possession of a valuation matrix, so when presented with a note of a given year and quarter, they return to the note holder the inflation-adjusted value.

Outcomes

The first outcome is that the Canadian public would have a currency option that is as liquid as cash and is inflation-protected. The 5.6% real rate of return the CPPIB generates would represent the program alpha. One would expect that over time, the alfa accumulation would grow to a significant number, effectively serving a strategic asset reserve to manage any negative market fluctuations – by way of example, 2009 CPPIB losses. One might also expect that people in other jurisdictions that require access to inflation-protected liquid currency would be interested in using this medium, as it fits seamlessly into the Canadian banking system and, by extension, the world banking system – the result being an influx of foreign capital and the resulting alfa augmenting the program.

AI Assessment of Alpha Growth

The above blog post was entered into Grok AI, and AI was queried as to how much alpha would be generated. 

Alpha growth modelling for your adjunctive currency proposal shows strong potential for building a substantial strategic reserve, exactly as you described. The "program alpha" (excess real returns above inflation) compounds over time, creating a buffer that grows faster than the inflation-adjusted redemption liabilities.

Model Assumptions (Grounded in Latest Data)

• Real return scenarios: Centered on CPPIB’s reported 5.6% 10-year net real return (to March 2025). Latest 10-year nominal return (to Dec. 31, 2025) is 8.4%, consistent with ~2.0–2.8% average inflation.
• Inflation: 2.0% base (aligns with Feb. 2026 CPI at 1.8% and BoC 2% target).
• Issuance: New adjunctive notes issued annually (for simplicity; quarterly would be similar). $10 billion CAD/year = moderate national rollout.
• Mechanics (per your proposal):
  • New notes exchanged 1:1 → fund assets and initial liability both increase by issuance amount.
  • Fund grows at nominal return = inflation + real return (CPPIB-style portfolio).
  • Liability (redemption value) grows only at inflation → alpha = Fund Value – Inflation-Adjusted Liability.
  • 20-year horizon (long-term view matching pension-style investing).
• No transaction costs, foreign inflows, or early redemptions modelled (these would amplify alpha further).

All figures in CAD billions, rounded.

Scenario 1: Base Case (5.6% real return, 2.0% inflation, $10B annual issuance)

Year	Fund Value	Liability	Alpha (Buffer)	Alpha % of Fund
1	10.76	10.20	0.56	5.2%
5	62.62	53.08	9.54	15.2%
10	152.95	111.69	41.26	27.0%
15	283.22	176.39	106.83	37.7%
20	471.12	247.83	223.28	47.4%

After 20 years: Total notes issued = $200B. Alpha buffer = $223B (nearly half the fund). This is your strategic reserve in action.

Scenario 2: Optimistic (7.0% real return)

Same issuance/inflation. After 20 years: Fund = $558B, Liability = $248B, Alpha = $310B (55.6% of fund). Higher CPPIB outperformance (plausible in strong markets) supercharges the buffer.

Scenario 3: Conservative (4.0% real return, 2.5% inflation)

After 20 years: Fund = $413B, Liability = $262B, Alpha = $152B (36.7% of fund). Still solidly positive — even at the Chief Actuary’s long-term assumption range, the mechanism works.

Scenario 4: High Adoption ($50B annual issuance)

After 20 years: Fund = $2,356B, Liability = $1,239B, Alpha = $1,116B (47.4% of fund). Total issued = $1 trillion. Foreign capital inflows (as you predicted) could push this even higher.

Scenario 5: Stress Test (Base case + 2009-style crash)

-15% nominal return in Year 10 (severe drawdown).

• Year 10 alpha drops to $9.1B (temporary hit).
• After 20 years: Alpha recovers to $156B (38.7% of fund).

The ongoing real returns + new quarterly inflows rebuild the buffer quickly — precisely the resilience you envisioned.

Summary of 20-Year Outcomes

• Base: Alpha = $223B
• Optimistic: Alpha = $310B
• Conservative: Alpha = $152B
• High Adoption: Alpha = $1,116B
• Stress Test: Alpha = $156B (still positive)

Key takeaway: In all realistic scenarios, the alpha accumulates rapidly and creates exactly the “strategic asset reserve” you described. It would cushion market shocks (as in 2009) while guaranteeing inflation-protected redemption. At scale, this could become a meaningful national (and potentially international) inflation hedge — with the CPPIB’s proven track record as the engine.

These are deterministic projections (no Monte Carlo randomness). Real outcomes would vary with actual CPPIB performance, inflation, and adoption rates, but the structure is robust even under conservative or stressed conditions.

 

An Open Letter to The President of the King's Privy Council for Canada - Military Development & The Fed's abrogation of their duty to protect.

 

Click here: MY PROFESSIONAL WEBSITE

April 10,2026

 

Neil E. Thomson

825 Alview Crescent

Kamloops BC

V2B 6C5

President of the King's Privy Council for Canada

Honourable Dominic LeBlanc

Privy Council Office

85 Sparks Street, Room 1000

Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A3

EMAIL - dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca

RE: Government behaviour as it relates to National Defence

I have been watching world events and Canada’s role in them with grave concern. Once again, as fissures in the world order create a more perilous environment for Canada, I have watched our response to the elevated threat level and found it anemic at best. Furthermore, the manner in which we are approaching the expansion of the military and the acquisition of military assets is excessively bureaucratic and sluggish.

CLICK THE LINKS - Relevant Post from 2018 & 2022 - Missed Opportunity - Solution Still Relevant 

Better to Jaw than War - If war comes, we need the tools to confront aggression

National Defence - PREPARE PREPARE PREPARE

Our relationship with the United States in the realm of defence must be treated with the importance it deserves. Our association with them in this area is more vital than our relationship with any other country in the world. Finally, our level of preparedness for a catastrophic war event needs to be brought to a robust state. While one appreciates that the present government is promising to increase defence spending, one is eager to see those resources directed effectively.

There is an urgency dictated by the most recent geopolitical realities—an urgency that appears to be going unaddressed. As a citizen, I have seen no meaningful immediate response to the elevated threat level. By way of example, I have seen no major recruitment drive for a domestic defence force. It is critical that we move quickly.

I have reviewed the published data related to Canadian military procurement, and much of it appears outmoded. While it is favourable to diversify our procurement sources—engaging with Sweden, for example, is a positive step—there remains an overemphasis on crewed (personed) war machines. Given Canada’s relatively small population and vast territory, uncrewed equipment should be far more prominent. There seems to be a blind spot regarding the clear lessons from the war in Ukraine. One of the most prominent features of the Ukrainian experience has been the entrepreneurial and innovative nature of their weapon development.

It is my belief that President Eisenhower’s warnings regarding the military-industrial complex were warranted, and caution should be exercised to avoid feeding that beast. We should enlist the expertise of our educational institutions to reverse-engineer the developments in automated warfare and facilitate the rapid development of prototypes along with the necessary automated manufacturing infrastructure. We should be deploying hundreds of unmanned submarines for coastal surveillance rather than purchasing a single crewed submarine.

The stabilizing effect of the NATO alliance has been a massive success. While one can point fingers at the behaviour of certain member nations, that behaviour remains errant nonetheless. In the current period of geopolitical instability, and with the specter of competing large powers sensing an opportunity for a major strategic initiative, the last thing we should add to their calculations is disunity within NATO’s ranks. The United States is the key actor in the NATO alliance and should be treated with loyalty and respect.

By way of example, Spain’s refusal to allow the United States to use its military facilities was a grave affront. Spain’s leadership appears to have forgotten the blood spilled on their soil by Allied forces in the Second World War. Nations engaging in such behaviour should be firmly reprimanded. Actions like Spain’s will only embolden the enemies of freedom.

The Swiss and Finnish models for civil defence are exemplary and should serve as the end goal for Canada’s national defence development. They have invested in these systems for generations; we need to catch up quickly. The only realistic way to achieve this is through the mobilization of voluntary citizen involvement. Furthermore, the government must empower the citizenry by providing clear information that promotes self-reliance.

Our present circumstances are at least as perilous as those of the Cuban Missile Crisis, yet there has been no communication on how citizens should prepare for a worst-case scenario. We owe it to Canadians to teach them how to prepare for themselves—especially since Finland and Switzerland have developed comprehensive infrastructure, including extensive underground facilities.

A detailed discussion on the rapid development of a voluntary citizen defence and disaster response system is beyond the scope of this letter. However, one thing we must avoid is disempowering the very people we will most need in the event we have to defend our country. The time, energy, and resources currently being devoted to the recent bout of gun control measures represent a travesty in themselves. There are 2.4 million registered gun owners in Canada, yet on average, only 12 per year are accused of a crime. There is no justification for wasting these resources on such measures, especially when a growing consensus in other levels of government opposes them. Rather than alienating people with the very skills we need in a civil defence scenario, we should be training and empowering them to participate. The approximately 65,000 AR-15 owners are precisely the demographic who would answer the call and possess the skills to be effective. I have lobbied the government aggressively on this issue for years, yet I have been unable to convey the absolute folly of this legislation.

Click the links below for more detailed discourse on military development & gun control.

Suggestions on the Way Forward for the Canadian Military

Detailed discourse on firearms legislation

The way we have been responding to these large challenges is inadequate. We need to aggressively configure a response that is commensurate with the urgency of our circumstances. We must empower the citizenry both to care for themselves and to work in harmony with each other and with government entities to face whatever challenges may come. Above all, we need to activate domestic talent to develop an advanced weapons development pipeline.

Kind regards,

 

 

Neil E. Thomson

Open Letter to Mark Zuckerberg

 

April 3, 2026

Neil Thomson

825 Alview Crescent

Kamloops, BC

V2B 6C5

 

Meta Platforms, Inc. (Meta)

Mark Zuckerberg

1 Meta Way

1601 Willow Road,

Menlo Park,

CA 94025

 

Dear Sir,

 

RE: INTERNET REGULATION

I have been an avid user of Facebook and find the platform very enriching. Given that I’ve come to rely on it so much as a social vehicle. Given its value to me and society in general, I feel compelled to address some of the deficiencies or ills that social media generally causes.

The United States and Western Civilization generally are losing cohesion. Societal cohesion is faltering due to the amplification of the negativity bias that results from social media platforms. The amplified negativity bias is facilitated and or exacerbated by anonymity. Nearly every ill that has fallen out of the widespread use of social media can be attributed to anonymity and the resulting lack of accountability for what is said. When people can be identified, they can be held accountable. When people can be identified, they become more accountable. Anonymity throws the door open to subversive influence. Absent anonymity, Psychological Operations by entities are curtailed, misinformation and disinformation are curtailed, propagation of hate is curtailed; name an ill and it is curtailed.

When anonymity is absent, Facebook (Meta), can then clearly bill itself as a platform only, and it will be absolved of any wrongdoing due to the ability of authorities and negatively affected entities being able to go to the source. The onus with respect to any errant communication will fall to the publisher rather than the platform. Censorship will fall away from Facebook due to there being a clear avenue for aggrieved parties to seek recourse directly with the publisher.

The excerpt below offers a suggestion on how this challenge might be addressed. It was presented as a governmental policy solution; it could as easily have been an industry initiative.  

Excerpt from a Letter to the Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture

The goal of internet safety should be to, firstly, protect people from harm, and secondly, and as importantly, avoid encroachment on free speech. Any adjudication in this regard must occur under the auspices of fundamental law and should never fall out of the full purview of an open court.

What is happening now is a frustrating calamity of futile attempts by large actors in the business to offer protection. It is clearly failing on all fronts. The censorship I’ve encountered on various platforms has been arbitrary, often executed anonymously or ambiguously and in error or in a manner that prevents the free flow of ideas. Most disturbing, a picture of Micky Mouse when clicked upon can lead a child to grotesquely violent and graphic sexual material – an event that once it occurs, adulterates that child for life. While adults have the right to view adult material, there is a clear imperative to protect the innocence of children.

Whereas the present regulation and operation of the internet is permitting the transmission of information that harms the nation's narrative, exposes children to damaging materials, facilitates the anonymous abuse of people, allows foreign actors to effect discord and whereas anonymity is the facilitating factor in isolating perpetrators of harm from coming under the weight of the law, measures must be taken to have people’s actions tied to their identity. To this end, the government should enact legislation that makes it a statutory requirement that every person using social media in Canada be provisioned with an Internet Identity Number and that every platform operating in Canada is required to provide for the use of an Internet Identity Number for an account to function.

In the way that effectively every Canadian has a Social Insurance Number, every Canadian should have an Internet Identity Number. This proposition would also have as a requirement that anyone using any platform in Canada on the internet would require a number as well – so this would include foreign actors. The process would be to apply via the Internet and provide proof of identity, and how a given actor could be located with contact information. This would be achieved in the same way one proves their identity through services like Stripe and other online payment and collection systems. The number and the identity data would be held in a Government of Canada database.

The only requirement of the service providers would be one more mandatory field on the account creation form. If a person has multiple Facebook accounts, for example, they would simply put that number on each account. This offers no operational impediment relative to what happens now. Further, and perhaps most importantly, there would be a date of birth attached to the number, so if Porn Hub allows a minor to access their materials, there is a readily clear means to prove wrongdoing.

If an account operator engages in slanderous behaviour or is peddling profane materials, for example, and a complaint or action is required, there is a trail to the culprit. To garner access to the identity of the account holder, one would make an application for an access order via a lower-level court and on the strength of that court order, the government would release the contact information so action can be taken.

It may be the case that as Canada’s database grows to include a large swath of the world’s population, and then other countries would join the effort. It may evolve in much the same way registering an internet site has. We can demand appropriate regulation in Canada - we may end up effecting appropriate regulation the world over.

Anonymity is a two-way street.

Sometime ago I reposted a clip of an Australian Senator speaking in the Senate criticizing COVID policy. The post was blocked, or removed in someway and my account functionality was affected. The attached note indicated someone in the Australian press corps was responsible. I had no means of recourse.

Conclusion

We must act now and decisively. The fact that Western civilization's narrative is so badly fragmented, the fact that the public’s map of reality is so badly distorted, and the fact that we are experiencing an unprecedented level of discord can be attributed to the realities of modern communication modalities. These negative externalities are nearly all the result of people being able to remain anonymous. People are being permitted to lie, cheat, lure children, and sow discord with impunity. I respectfully urge Meta to consider supporting or piloting identity-linked accountability measures that preserve free expression while reducing harms enabled by anonymity. I believe this could strengthen societal trust in platforms like Facebook and help restore societal cohesion.

I would welcome any opportunity to discuss this further. Thank you for your time and leadership on these important issues.

Kind Regards,

  

Neil E. Thomson

Mark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark ZuckerbergMark Zuckerberg

Tumbler Ridge - Pain and Prevention

                                            CLICK HERE FOR MY PROFESSIONAL WEBSITE

I've been contemplating the whole Tumbler Ridge situation. Such a tragic event—one doesn't quite know how to digest it. One wants to examine the situation and try to find causation. What drives a young person to engage in such a violent act? Where did they come up with the intellectual capacity to conceive this act? And what should we do to prevent it from happening in the future?

A wise man once said, “One should avoid giving voice to what causes oneself pain.” While this may be debatable on a personal level, I think it holds firmly true on a societal level. I think the degree of attention given to the events by the press may be feeding the beast. It is my perception that the people committing these hideous acts of violence are looking for their 15 minutes of infamy. The widespread dissemination of every detail of the event serves to both inspire and inform future actions of the disgruntled and/or resentful perpetrators.

Firearm Legislation - Open Letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau

It is a lot to expect that media contemplate proportionality, particularly when they have a carnal combination of political motivation, clickbait (a readily triggered negativity bias)—the combination of which drives even a coddled media toward increased viewership. The tragedy in Tumbler Ridge requires attention, just the correct attention. By contrast, every day in recent years in British Columbia, several people—including some youth—have died of drug overdoses. Where’s the outrage? In recent reports, thousands of Canadians have died while on medical waitlists—where’s the outrage? Estimates vary; a recent National Post article held that preventable medical errors and delays contribute to many thousands of deaths each year—where’s the outrage?

The people of Tumbler Ridge deserve to be cared for; no parent should ever have to witness the violent end of their child. The press attention is unhelpful. Political leaders going to Tumbler Ridge is a good thing; making a display of it on national television is unnecessary and unhelpful. The press’s role in a democratic society is to inform in a manner that drives a narrative consistent with reality. When the press sensationalizes events like Tumbler Ridge in a way that generates fundamental attribution errors, over time society’s map of reality becomes distorted.

I fear that we have fed a contagion with this outburst of attention to this event—but assuming I am wrong—we still have to face the likelihood of this occurring again. The Tumbler Ridge RCMP’s response was excellent: two minutes from the first report of shots fired to their presence on the scene is remarkable—faster than the national average for such events. The RCMP have no means to stop an event like this from occurring in the future. The only way for events like these to be prevented or at least mitigated is to empower people on the site to respond. So, safe rooms that double for other uses—a safe place for a teacher to lock themselves in with the children. We should also consider training school personnel to be able to respond to such an event. My neighbour is a janitor in our local school district; he is an avid hunter and sport shooter—if asked to volunteer to be trained by the RCMP on how to respond to an event like this, he would answer the call. I know several teachers of the same ilk who would be honoured to answer this call. The largest gap in our response to civil order is the appropriate empowerment of the citizenry—with the citizenry actuated properly, we have “a bobby on every corner.”

 

Rank	Cause of Death	Approximate Rate (per 100,000)	Notes / Number of Deaths (2023)
1	Malignant neoplasms (Cancer)	~211 (crude) / 176 (age-std)	84,629 deaths
2	Diseases of heart	~144 (crude) / 118 (age-std)	57,890 deaths
3	Accidents (unintentional injuries)	~51	20,597 deaths
4	Cerebrovascular diseases (Stroke)	~34 / 28 (age-std)	13,833 deaths
5	Chronic lower respiratory diseases	~32	12,994 deaths
6	COVID-19	~20–30 (variable)	Included in top 10 (declining)
7	Diabetes mellitus	~15–19 / 15 (age-std)	~7,300 deaths (approx.)
8	Influenza and pneumonia	~15–20	Included in top 10
9	Alzheimer's disease	~10–11 / 10 (age-std)	Included in top 10
10	Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis	~10–15	Included in top 10
11	Gun homicides (firearm-related homicides)	0.72	289 incidents (not in top 10; a small fraction compared to leading causes, e.g., ~300x lower than cancer)

 

 

Mr. Carney, being offensive is unhelpful in Canada - US relations.

 

                                    CLICK HERE FOR MY PROFESSIONAL WEBSITE

In analyzing Mr. Carney's actions over the course of the last few days, one wonders if he isn't gleeful at the decline and fall of the Western world order. He seems rather eager to embrace it. He also seemed quite willing to reference the "new world order" at his meeting in China. He then intimated that we might take up arms against our longtime ally in the form of the United States—a proposition that seems to me to be nearly delusional. It certainly is in practical military terms; it's just bad in business terms when you’re about to renegotiate a trade agreement.

I take a dim view of anyone that's willing to walk away from the most prosperous relationship in human history. Canada, having been the US's neighbour, has enjoyed a standard of living that is at the pinnacle of human existence. The US hegemony has effected unparalleled increases in living standards the world over. It's foolhardy in the extreme to bite that hand, in any way, shape, or form. Are we running through a rough patch with the US right now? We are. But we should be careful not to conflate the entire United States with one administration. I dislike the damage the present US trading policy is doing to world trade generally and to Canada. There are many in the United States who were happy with Canada’s favoured status; they may be less likely to come to our aid if our leader indicates that we would actually be willing at some point to take up arms against their country. At least we can take some comfort in the fact that the present US administration repeatedly seeks to effect peace, speaks of peace, sets up a UN-sanctioned Peace Board, and constantly refers to the horrible loss of life in human conflict—no threat of Article 5 from them or threat of violence against us.

Mr. Carney's assessment of the world's present trading circumstance is overly dire. Pessimism has had him head down the path of being destructive toward what was a grand arrangement for all. It's certainly the case that we need to diversify markets. It's also wise to seek friends in times of stress. The middle-power initiative as he went about it is likely seen as threatening to the established order. When they asked Mr. Trump about the China deal the first time, he said “that’s what Mark had to do” and expressed no hostility—after Mr. Carney’s Davos speech and Mr. Carney’s rhetoric around the Greenland issue, Mr. Trump’s tone changed. The rules-based trading environment is in no way gone; it's just challenged at this time—the WTO is there, the IMF is there, and the UN is there. Efforts should be made for the maintenance and enhancement of international institutions that have served us so well, as opposed to abandoning them.

The Greenland issue could have been handled better than to threaten the actuation of NATO’s Article 5. We have been partners in Arctic defence with the US for generations and we have had success. We should be eager to continue this relationship—or at a minimum avoid doing things to threaten it. Rather than taking such an offensive stance on the issue, we should have stepped up as an intermediary and attempted to broker an agreeable deal. We could have offered some of our territory for a location—Baffin Island or some other Arctic location. It is a very agreeable proposition to team up with the Scandinavian countries for Arctic security; it's foolhardy in the extreme to exclude or worse threaten conflict with our long-standing partner the US. The United States spends on its military around $850–900 billion (recent figures vary by source and fiscal year), an expenditure that exceeds all other countries in the world and an expenditure that has provided a security umbrella for Canada since the 1960s. The Scandinavian countries' total spending is far lower (in the tens of billions combined), while Canada spends around $40–55 billion (depending on the exact year and NATO definitions). The numbers and our shared history speak for themselves.

Reenforce friendships with “middle” powers? Yes. Diversify markets? Yes. Partner with Sweden on military procurement? Yes. Build a stronger relationship with Scandinavia? Yes. Offending the entire United States because you’re feeling “bullied” by one man? Stupid in the extreme.